DAYS OF GAME

35 Responses to Korean Girl, My First Tourist, +1 Daygame

1. YOHAMI ZERPA says:

   06/01/2017 at 11:22 am

   There you go. Hitting gold.

   “I don’t even know her name.”

   Beautiful.

   Reply
   • Nash says:

     06/02/2017 at 12:51 am

     Thanks, man.

     She was a yes girl. Quite high YHT value, but a yes girl. I did a good job of being “professional” in the basic sense of knowing what to do, how fast to do it. I walked her through the model. We had a great time.

     ^ This is basic “intermediate” game.

     Good deal.

     She is a bit princess-like. I don’t know that I’d want her as a GF. But it was a great experience.

     And I can’t help but think of what that was like for her. For me, I was trying to do that, this is my lifestyle. For her, it had to be at least a little bit more unusual for her than it was for me.

     It is amazing how trusting some of these girls are… she knew me for total of about 3 hours of face-time. And she was in my house, naked, on her back, arms pinned over her head. And totally comfortable.

     She had zero incentive to do any of that… except for the adventure of it, for the sex, and for time with a “dangerous man.”

     Reply
   • Nash says:

     06/02/2017 at 1:01 am

     Also… I was reading some Rollo Tomasi (after Rauker sent me a note) and found some footprints of the Yohami from 2012:

     “Why offer help when you can just offer dick.”
     — YOHAMI
     April 26, 2012 at 2:02 pm

     Love to see your voice out in the world.

     Reply
2. Ilijas Jung Deutscher Red Pill Blog says:

   06/01/2017 at 4:23 pm

   Damn creamy post!!
   How long are you staying in asia world?

   The taste hahahha
   Amazing
   -IJ

   Reply
   • Nash says:

     06/02/2017 at 12:53 am

     Hey, thanks.

     >> How long are you staying in asia world?

     You know I’m not in Asia, right? I was in Japan for 6 weeks earlier this year, but I live in California. But I love Asian girls… and no plans to change that.

     I haven’t dated a girl that was born in the US in a very long time… all girls born in Asia, here studying or having just moved here.

     Reply
3. rivelino says:

   06/01/2017 at 5:57 pm

   “That is my 10th daygame lay… and my 2nd new girl in seven days. And the 4th daygame girl I fucked this week.”

   THIS MAN IS ON FIRE!!!

   Reply
   • Nash says:

     06/02/2017 at 12:57 am

     Thanks, Riv.

     Both last week, and last night… I had that feeling like maybe I was dreaming all this. Especially as I pass out on the couch, and then wake up in the middle of the night… and walk to my bedroom to sleep in the mess she/I made last night… I have to double-take to be sure I’m not imagining it all.

     But it’s real. I re-read my post from last night this morning as I woke up… “yep, it really happened.”

     And today I have “low chemicals.” I feel a little bit burned out, but that’s normal for when I have sex that isn’t “energizing” — which it can sometimes be. This took some emotional effort last night — processing it takes emotional effort — and I’m a little emotionally wiped-out today.

     Gonna have beers/food with my buddy Natural in a couple hours. I want a night a “nothing.”

     Reply
4. rivelino says:

   06/01/2017 at 6:31 pm

   spreading the word about the best #daygame blog

   https://twitter.com/alpharivelino/status/870339007854596096

   Reply
   • Nash says:

     06/02/2017 at 12:59 am

     Thank you very much, man. I appreciate this support.

     Yes to comradery. Yes to this whole community.

     Reply
5. YOHAMI ZERPA says:

   06/03/2017 at 10:25 pm

   Leaving this here – Peterson is a very smart guy, even when I don’t agree with some of his conclusions, or mainly how he gets to them

   Reply
6. rivelino says:

   06/04/2017 at 10:05 pm

   did you see JP answer the question on how a man can find love? it’s shockingly bad.

   https://youtu.be/DsHrKvRqhzY

   Reply
   • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

     06/05/2017 at 12:32 am

     Yep. If you watch that whole thing (the video I posted contains this segment) he tells his story. He met a girl when he was 7 years old, she was one year older, he fell in love and chased her for years while she treated him like a wimp. At age 13 she “went her own way” which means she started to be interested in masculine men. Then he eventually won her over. So his core reality is basic beta / blue pill even when he’s red pill in many ideas – he continually fails to tie the dots.

     For him it’s all symbology and not life experience. Or bluntly – with lots of subjects he just doesn’t “know” what he’s talking about. In personal it bothers me that he’s just bad at logic – the ideas he puts together lack cohesion, the only string pulling them together is his narrative and it has lots of gaps.

     But still one of the smartest guys I’ve seen around.

     The things he could do if he’d fill that brain with better data.

     Reply
   • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

     06/05/2017 at 12:37 am

     Another thing – he answers this video with the same stories, pauses, etc that I’ve seen him doing live, he repeats the same argument verbatim, even with the same changes in subject and reflexions, so even if it looks like he’s ranting this is all performance art – this is a guy who’s been saying the same things for who knows how many years to his students, and now is repeating the same thing to the cameras. So that’s not a man thinking in front of you. He’s repeating something the thought once and then ironed in public. Like a stand up comedian. His ideas are not necessarily still breathing and changing, it’s not an alive thing.

     Reply
     • rivelino says:

       06/06/2017 at 7:14 am

       “So his core reality is basic beta / blue pill even when he’s red pill in many ideas – he continually fails to tie the dots.”

       “So that’s not a man thinking in front of you. He’s repeating something the thought once and then ironed in public. His ideas are not necessarily still breathing and changing, it’s not an alive thing.”

       interesting stuff, man.

       i am open to listening to your critique of JP, since his advice on how to find love was so bad!

       Reply
     • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

       06/06/2017 at 7:33 am

       Well – stuff like he starts framing the attraction between men and women as “mysterious” and repeats the word a few times, then cites biology, which isn’t mysterious (could be unknown, but with very clear and predictable rules).

       Then talks about being able to tell the truth and the value of having your partner locked up to you so she cannot run. Think about that.

       In other video talks about the value of being able to have long conversations with his partner to change her behaviour (which are surely still going after 20 years of conversations).

       But then he says women want dangerous men, (civilized) men that women would want to be taking part in making them civilized – so basically this is where the woman is there invested on changing the man.

       90% of that is beta frame, even the last part, as maybe he sees “nagging” as an attempt of civilizing a man.

       Still when he says that women wants dangerous men who have the power to be cruel – but don’t use the power – he gets it. When he says the nature of men is being less agreeable and more competitive he gets it. When he describes how women find biologically fit men attractive, he gets it. When he talks about compromise / responsibility as the source for your own happiness, he gets it. Moral as a succession of prohibitions, he gets it.

       What he’s not getting is how the things relate to each other. It’s flashes of reality without structure.

       The guy saying “it’s mysterious” it’s not the same guy saying “women are attracted to fit dangerous men”, nor the guy trying to change women’s behaviour by arguing, or the guy thinking it’s a good thing to lock his women or she’d run away.

       Would be nice to have a talk with him about this.

       Reply
     • Nash says:

       06/06/2017 at 10:41 pm

       >>If you watch that whole thing

       I watched at least 1/2 of it on Sunday… I have to say, it’s one of the worst videos I’ve seen from him. Partly, I guess, as it’s Q&A… so it’s all over the place.

       I’ve watched probably 50+ hours of him talking, at this point.

       >> But still one of the smartest guys I’ve seen around.

       Yeah… I’m very interested in your critique, Yohami. Which tell me that you find him interesting, and I’m not surprised. He is a very interesting man. But I’m glad you find him smart… if you dismissed him, for my part, it would tell me you’re not listening.

       I am super invested in the guy… he’s blowing me away. One of the most powerful and interesting men I’ve ever been exposed to.

       Not about game… but about other things.

       Reply
     • Nash says:

       06/06/2017 at 10:57 pm

       >> For him it’s all symbology and not life experience.

       Interesting POV. I agree with some of that. And on the other hand, that “all symbology” — I think that is a strength of his.

       He isn’t “creative” about his symbolism. He sees the truth in classic myths/archetypes/symbols. And in that sense, he doesn’t have to “know.” It wouldn’t hurt to know, but if you “get something,” you don’t have to re-live every pain in human history to get what it means.

       HARVARD TALK:

       >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urd0IK0WEWU

       This is another recent talk… very, very good. Starts of fucking with the SJWeirdos, but then… he gets into some very interested territory, saying things I’ve really never heard anyone say… on not in his way.

       “The meaning of life is to be found in the adoption of individual responsibility. And that is what the universities should be teaching people.”
       — Jordan Peterson

       That ^ is a soundbite, and maybe that’s not impressive. I love this stuff, and when we starts talking about this stuff, I’ve been really listening. I am noticing I am thinking about his comments a lot of the time these days… I’ve been studying him since January.

       He talks like an “elder.” I think he is genuinely wise.

       “Adopting some responsibility, and trying to straighten out their lives, and to bear the load of being properly, and to forthrightly move through existence, and to become a credit to themselves and their community. That’s what you should do, instead of waving cards at someone telling them to behave more properly because you’re morally superior to them.”
       — 39:20

       “It’s a call to proper being. It’s a call to heroic being. It’s a call for people to adopt their individual responsibility and to straighten themselves out. And to find out what they could be like if they took on the burdens of existence like respectable, well educated, articulate, powerful people. That’s to the benefit of everyone. That is where the responsibility lies.”
       — 40:00

       I love this stuff from him. It’s so “manly.” It’s essential “patriarch” advice.

       He is a genuine “leader of men,” and he talks on and on about how men are the ones that are tuning into him.

       And in this talk, at some point, he’s giving the noisy SJW college kids a hard time… and he says, “they have no experience.” Something like that.

       And in comparison, he says… “go live, do somethings, run a business, raise a family, then you’ll know.”

       Of course ^ this is right. And he HAS done things.

       In this sense, he is about life experience.

       Reply
     • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

       06/06/2017 at 11:10 pm

       Yeah – when he’s talking about responsibility and meaning he’s cohesive, all these dots are tied and proper.

       In another talk he starts about how first you organize little bits of your life and after a while you go from a “fix it” to “build it” mentality and you find grander objectives. He’s got a lot of things there well placed.

       But then, for example, he circles that in another talk saying that part of the hero path is to return home and save your dead father, which means bringing back christianity – and the reason for that is that it is an arcane religion and humans are historical creatures, and that if you reject your history you cannot live.

       Which is hot air – though, it matches his particular story.

       Then he talks about male female relationships – and the talks with the same conviction, but with much less of a clue, which for me it’s a red flag. You know, people talking vehemently about things they don’t know about.

       Lastly – he ties things up in the air like he’s a sculpture – the subjects rarely relate to each other in a logical manner (with the exception of when he’s talking about responsibility and meaning, when he goes in detail and with full resolution, as he calls it, everything is there in order), but instead it’s non-related ideas that give context, or flavor to each other, it has a 3D effect and let’s you see past the courtain in some cases, he’s doing an art form.

       But that carries other issues as in – his ideas are not necessarily connected and is missing important things in the gaps.

       I’ve been watching many hours of his stuff too after you posted that link. I had dismissed him quick before because the first thing I saw from him was some clueless MTGOW rant followed by that (misguided) pinoccio story that he likes. But he’s a powerhouse and we need more guys like him. You don’t have to get everything right, no one does, I don’t – what’s needed is people out there moving these neurons and asking questions and revealing things. So kudos to him, and I hope I get to talk to mr P in the future. That’d be something.

       Reply
     • Nash says:

       06/07/2017 at 9:37 pm

       Yeah… I have a lot of criticisms of the guy, too. He’s human in many ways… and superhuman in others.

       He is a little “shrill,” and that was the first thing that turned me off to him. And his “and that’s that,” is non-intellectual at the level of “because I said so.”

       >> Then he talks about male female relationships – and the talks with the same conviction, but with much less of a clue, which for me it’s a red flag. You know, people talking vehemently about things they don’t know about.

       I don’t trust his experience with women, but I trust him as a biologist and at the level of “symbology” and what he’s taken away from myths.

       To that last point — myths — a lot of myths (Romeo/Juliet) won’t teach you about game, but they can teach you about “attractive archetypes” which a player can use in game. They can give you “stories” to use that have worked in love/seduction forever.

       So when I first mention him… it was based on his Beauty/Beast comments. And that is dead-on real, in terms of game/seduction. It’s not a “how to,” it’s not a “map,” but it’s an “emotional target.”

       Yes, I think women do want “to take the badboy.” But that’s not saying “let her tame you.” But let that fantasy of the untamable beast be a part of the seduction. And her occupying the princess role (not on a pedastal, but) such that she has that “mythical feeling” to the seduction. That is excellent “romance” and game.

       I am doing tons of “dangerous guy” stuff with the girls in my life… really modelling what he is pointing to in his Beauty/Beast comments. He did not teach me this (it was Lance Mason who first exposed me to “romance novel formula”, his concept is “Andre and the Anime Girl” vs “Bob” and “The Nun”), but in this way, I think JP can point in the right direction in game… even if he’s a clueless beta in his own life.

       >> But he’s a powerhouse and we need more guys like him.

       Agreed. I’m going to do another post on him, based on what he has to say about dominance. I’m very interested in his comments about dominance, evolution, mating and society.

       Reply
     • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

       06/08/2017 at 1:58 am

       Nash – here’s another example of Peterson rambling incoherently

       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqeVWrtxclc

       So – it’s not that he’s speaking falsehoods, but he starts on a subject, then uses a tangent to illustrate the point and instead of returning to the subject, switches to the tangent, then he brings another tangent, which he also follows. In this case he doesn’t deviate from the main idea too much so it can still be structured.

       That jumping reminds me of my own mind when I used to smoke marijuana. I smoke for over a year trying to retain that skill, which I kind of did.

       What keeps Peterson’s speech articulated there is not the cohesiveness of the ideas he’s presenting, but his tone. The speed, the intention, the place where he’s going, the gesticulation – so Peterson himself is the substance. Like an artist, a painter, a sculptor, etc. He’s more like a priest.

       I’ve seen him talking with people asking direct questions and he does all the circling on them. Maybe he’s always stoned, or his brain works like that by nature.

       On the other hand I’ve seen a lot of his videos and when he revisits a subject, he takes the same tangents and their derivations – it’s like for him these ideas are connected in a fixed way like they were a logical structure, when they are not.

       It’s strange but has a mesmerizing effect.

       Reply
7. rivelino says:

   06/06/2017 at 7:12 am

   “Every girl is a manipulator… it’s in their DNA. They will take just as much as you let them take. That’s the implicit deal between men and women. If you’re strong… she’ll take a little more than you want to give. If you’re weak… she’ll take everything.”

   #redpillwisdom

   Reply
8. rivelino says:

   06/06/2017 at 7:21 am

   “There was one story from Lance Mason about how if a girl doesn’t like to receive, let her please you instead. And as I write this, I’m thinking of my last call with Rivelino, and how he talked about how he likes ‘pull your cock out’ (PICO) game, and his advice to me on that call to ‘let the girl please you.’ And that came to mind. So I did.”

   OH YEAH. PICO BABY.

   here is d&p talking about pico. or is it PYCO?

   “The hardest part about getting laid is the transition from making out to penetration. I have a pretty simple method that usually leads to sex, and almost guarantees me a hand job. I just pull it out.”

   her erased that post from his blog, now that he’s famous, so here is the archive link:

   https://archive.is/4HNQk

   and here he is talking about PYCO again:

   “Next time, don’t settle for the make out. If possible, at least pull out your dick. If you can get her to touch it, even better. If not, just let her know that your cock is too swollen to go back into your jeans, and that, ‘Either you’re taking care of this, or I am.’ ”

   https://archive.is/Wbdi0

   Reply
   • Nash says:

     06/08/2017 at 9:43 pm

     Yeah… PYCO, ha… that’s what I meant.

     I heard it years ago in a “The 21 Convention” talk, a Q&A at the end of the convention. I remember being kind of shocked at the time… I couldn’t imagine myself doing it. Now… very normal.

     “He took it out.”

     — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpwJE5DEk7U

     Here’s a mainstream “review” of that technique. I linked to this from some other post I wrote when I was talking about PYCO… but I just botched the “acronym” when I wrote this post, I got it right the last time.

     “I spent so much time trying to get their clothes off, I never thought of taking mine off.”
     ^ From that clip above…

     I had Siren out to lunch last week… and we were in a restaurant, at a table alone, and talking about her ass and I got turned on and I just put her hand on my cock… her eyes got as big as dinner plates and she yanked her hand back into her lap. I didn’t PYCO… but that was enough for her.

     : ]

     Reply
9. rivelino says:

   06/06/2017 at 11:52 pm

   “This was fast sex. With a very young girl. It’s starting to feel normal.”

   OH YEAH

   Reply
10. YOHAMI ZERPA says:

    06/08/2017 at 7:46 pm

    Another brilliant rambling by Peterson where he builds the wrong castle. He’s got the bricks right – but he’s got some gaps. Because he doesnt go about this logically, he jumps over the gaps, and lands in the wrong conclusion

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jA96Kf30TQU&feature=push-u&attr_tag=rxBJOXvECksRewLi-6

    So – women are not “let’s make sure everyone receives enough”.

    Women apply to that only when they are the beneficiaries of that proposal. When they are uncover, in the mass, then they demand that “everyone” gets something, so they can receive their share without being exposed, and all in the name of “fairness”

    But the story is completely different when women are actually in charge of distribution.

    Because women quickly pick favourites, enemies, and all the distributions are made according to how they feel about specific individuals and never about a “fairness” that can be pointed as a principle. Women will not “make sure everyone has enough”. Not even do that with their own kids. That’s not the female archetype.

    Which Peterson would be able to discover very easily if he’d stop and question his assumptions (where I say he lacks real life experience) instead of jumping from tangents.

    Reply
11. daysofgame.com says:

    06/08/2017 at 11:03 pm

    Yeah… that’s a pretty wild talk. Maybe the most rambley I’ve seen him.

    I don’t know that his conclusions are wrong… but I agree that he has a lot of the right “bricks.” There is a shotgun blast of concepts in that talk… they don’t land that well, but good “bricks” indeed.

    (All this is “interesting,” because he doesn’t like “chaos.”)

    But… I think he’s trying to be thorough. In that other talk you posted (the Q&A one), he reads a question (2nd question?), and then breaks the question down into about 4 different variables… and asks questions about each part before he’ll try to approach the original question. That’s thoroughness.

    He wants to address the assumptions… I like that about him. Part of that is his science side… defining his terms.

    So… he’s a bit scatter-brained. But he’s also thorough.

    And meanwhile… I’d rather point to where he nails something than to when he meanders. He’s clearly human… but also super human in many ways.

    …………

    I think you’re picking at him from your “alpha” frame, Yohami. I think that’s why you’re more focused on his awkwardness than his power. Which is cool with me. My read is you like him, and he’s got things to offer you, but you’re maintaining “top guy” status by being the critic.

    : ]

    Reply
    • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

      06/08/2017 at 11:20 pm

      No that’s me communicating with the bs part of his intellect – my issue is not with his awkwardness but with the lack of logic. If anything is my omega battling his.

      I was in some ways like Peterson when I was an omega. He found a way to make it work in the academia and now became an alpha in that sphere – he’s taking the power away the academia and getting a tribe to follow him, he wants to take humanities out of college and teach people how to think and how to write, in short, he wants people to be like him, and he’s there taking the lead. Pure alpha. So more power to that.

      He’s still wrong and there’s no excuse really, when he’s got the right bricks. The assertion that “women are about giving each fairly” has no basis on that ramble, when in another video he states that empathy for your child, which is very strong in women, can and is often used to commit atrocities against many. And that there are more women in SJW, and SJW is obviously, in practice, not a “give everyone what’s fair” but “give me everything I want and I’ll destroy”. These things are out there in front of him. He touches on them, then he builds the wrong castle.

      Brain on drugs :-)

      Reply
      • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

        06/08/2017 at 11:25 pm

        “give me everything I want and I’ll destroy you in the process” – was the line

        Reply
    • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

      06/09/2017 at 10:10 am

      Badass https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0p1UFiNiOek

      Reply
      • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

        06/09/2017 at 12:01 pm

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGGB3QArS5I

        The third or so video where I’ve seen him say the same exact 5-6 speech, with same inflexions, pauses for laughs, etc. It’s performance art / standup. Mostly on point but then he goes with fallacies

        – “once you have enough money to be lower middle class, or a little lower than that, extra money doesn’t help you, it does not improve your life”

        Coming from someone who’s experienced a range from poverty from high class – really mr Peterson, fuck off and shut up.

        But he knows it – he makes 40K a month on Patreon only. He calls money a blessing and a tool – a tool that allows him to do things, in this case being more influential and gaining power. So does that money help him improve his life? if he knows, why does he state the opposite with that face and tone?

        – Then he points at women hypergamy and he’s on point there. So a man’s extra money is a requisite to attract these women. Is that money helping him? if he knows, why does he ask why are there any men working at higher positions?

        – His comment about lottery winners is valid, but these people didn’t earn the money, the result is they don’t have a frame that can sustain that reality. They can’t get there on their own, so all that money can only go to waste. Or, give a kid the 40K a month Peterson makes, and watch the kid fail at life as a result.

        Then he switches to talk about nature being a rigged game and he’s on point again.

        So I don’t know what to think about the lack of cohesion when he touches certain topics, other than he has not stopped to think about them for real. It’s not that he cant. But he’s ironed some of these speeches and repeats them, and they have huge gaps in the middle.

        Reply
      • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

        06/09/2017 at 12:02 pm

        “The third or so video where I’ve seen him say the same exact 5-6 [Minutes] speech”

        Reply
12. YOHAMI ZERPA says:

    06/09/2017 at 11:58 pm

    More Peterson spam :-)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZPU2ImiY9w

    So this girl is an interesting example of dynamics. She was in a leftist tribe she didn’t really belong to, meandering around, flirting with the unknown and the danger of the “right” and conservatism, watching videos in secret. Then she saw Peterson screaming to Antifa kids. And she saw him so strong, so dignified, that she was no longer confused and she switched tribes. Now she’s been posting about a dozen of videos where she talks about how Peterson changed her, and how much in distress she is, ‘help!’

    In a few words – this is a female switching tribes because she found an alpha. Now she wants to get to the center of the new tribe and get impregnated.

    Well done mr P.

    Reply
    • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

      06/10/2017 at 1:37 am

      And here the guy is masterful from beginning to end https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewU7Vb9ToXg

      Reply
13. YOHAMI ZERPA says:

    06/13/2017 at 12:39 am

    Here Peterson hits on game, never facing a No, doubling down etc: “wait till the rat does what you want, and then reward it”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-Z6Nyfuvlc

    Boom.

    Reply
    • YOHAMI ZERPA says:

      06/13/2017 at 12:44 am

      “deviation from expectation creates negative emotions”

      Which is why you lead, get her to anticipate your move, create a “ramp”, then make the move (when she’s receptive).

      Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.